翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Ohiri Field ・ Ohis ・ Ohisama ・ Ohio Union ・ Ohio University ・ Ohio University Aquatic Center ・ Ohio University College of Arts and Sciences ・ Ohio University Eastern Campus ・ Ohio University Press ・ Ohio University Southern Campus ・ Ohio University Women's Center ・ Ohio University – Chillicothe ・ Ohio University – Zanesville ・ Ohio v. Clark ・ Ohio v. Roberts ・ Ohio v. Robinette ・ Ohio Valley and Eastern Ohio Regional Transportation Authority ・ Ohio Valley Association of the Christian Baptist Churches of God ・ Ohio Valley Athletic Conference ・ Ohio Valley Career and Technical Center ・ Ohio Valley Conference ・ Ohio Valley Conference Baseball Tournament ・ Ohio Valley Conference Men's Basketball Player of the Year ・ Ohio Valley Electric Corporation ・ Ohio Valley Electric Railway ・ Ohio Valley Emmy Awards ・ Ohio Valley Greyhounds ・ Ohio Valley Hospital ・ Ohio Valley in Kentucky ・ Ohio Valley Mall Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Ohio v. Robinette ： ウィキペディア英語版 Ohio v. Robinette ''Ohio v. Robinette'', , was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Fourth Amendment does not require police officers to inform a motorist at the end of a traffic stop that they are free to go before seeking permission to search the motorist's car. == Background == While driving on a stretch of Interstate 70 north of Dayton, Ohio, Robinette was stopped for speeding. After verifying that Robinette had no prior violations, the officer asked Robinette to step out of his car before issuing him a verbal warning. The officer handed over Robinette's driver's license, and then asked him if he had any drugs or weapons in his car. Robinette said he did not. The officer asked Robinette if he could search the car, and Robinette agreed. The officer found a small amount of marijuana and a tablet of ecstasy. Robinette was arrested for possession of a controlled substance. Before trial, Robinette moved to suppress the evidence seized from his car, but the trial court denied that request. Robinette then pleaded no contest to the charge. On appeal, the Ohio District Court of Appeal reversed the conviction, ruling that the search resulted from an illegal detention. The Ohio Supreme Court affirmed, ruling that the police must end a traffic stop by informing a motorist that they are free to leave before attempting to engage the motorist in a consensual interrogation or search their car. The U.S. Supreme Court agreed to review the case. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Ohio v. Robinette」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.